|
|
|
Reflection #4
Schooling has never come very easy to me; I have always had to work at it. And so to think about one or two examples
of achievement is hard. It seems that all of my learning has been an example of achievement.
Perhaps the one closest to memory is an honors class that I took at San Juan College.
I had been out of school for sixteen years when I went back to college to get my teaching degree. I signed up for the Western Civilization class and reported the first day.
Dr. Bramhall began by taking roll and at first he did not call my name, (it was alphabetical and I wasn’t with
the S’s). He turned the page and said “okay now for the honor students…”
and he called my name. My first reaction was “what? What does honor student mean? And why am I on that list?” I
did not say anything though, I just kept listening. Dr. Bramhall then proceeded
to pass out the syllabus for the class and when he reached me I got a huge packet of stuff.
I started looking through it and reading the syllabus and realized that I had inadvertently signed up for the honors
section, which meant a lot of extra reading and writing. I did not know what
to do.
I really did not want to have to go change my schedule, and I did not want to admit to Dr. Bramhall that I did not
think I could handle the work, and so I resigned myself to the fact that I was in for a lot of hard work.
And it was a great deal of hard work! There was a paper due every week
based on primary sources that were in the packet that he handed out. The reading
was so hard that I would literally have to take it a phrase at a time, reading it, looking up words, and rewriting it in my
own words until I understood what was being said. I then had to write about it,
and quite often when I went back to the reading to find justification for my ideas it wouldn’t be there as I remembered
it. It was so hard. This process took me an average of five or six hours per paper, every week!
When I got my first paper back, Dr. Bramhall was kind and didn’t grade me too harshly, but I could tell that
it wasn’t up to muster and I had better do better. I stuck with it though
and I will tell you that I learned more in that class than I have ever learned in any other class, and so I took the second
semester class as an honors class. I struggled just as much the second semester
as the first but I have never felt more pleased with myself over a class than I did with that one. I learned that I could do hard things.
Issue #2
Should Struggling Students be retained?
I believe that it depends on the situation. Before I read the articles,
I believed that the decision, as to whether or not to retain struggling students, should be based on individual circumstances,
case by case, contingent on meetings and discussions with teachers, councilors, and parents, and in the case of older students,
the students themselves. After having read the articles, my belief has not changed.
According to the articles there does not seem to be sufficient scientific evidence to support one decision over the
other. The only thing that I see is that is seems to be less harmful to students
to be held back in the primary grades as opposed to secondary grades. I do however
think that the articles, especially the one written by Nancy Frey, brings some interesting points to the argument that should
be considered when conducting the meetings that will determine whether to retain struggling students or not.
The whole child should be considered when making any decisions that affect his education. I think that it is wrong to lump all children into one pile and make decisions based on the average medium
student, or strictly on standardized tests. Some students learn to read in kindergarten,
others not until second grade, but the point is that they learn to read. One
of the major factors to consider when deciding to retain students is not only their academic success, but also their emotional
success. Both articles address the issue of the emotional stigmatism attached to failing a grade. It is hard on the student. Therefore it is important to consider
this with each child. It seems to be especially important in the secondary grades,
when adolescents are very aware of what others may think about them.
I found Frey’s topic of delayed entry into kindergarten
an interesting factor. I think that the fact that more and more parents are holding
their children back before beginning kindergarten speaks to the stigmatism that retention carries with it. It seems that the parents want to make sure that their students are prepared physically and emotionally
to compete and be successful in school. They do not want to take the chance that
their child may be held back. But by choosing to hold their children back, they
are creating a situation in which the standards and expectations of kindergarten children are higher than perhaps they should
be; this puts greater strain on those children who are not kept back for economic or other reasons, which in turn may further
put already disadvantaged children at a more disadvantage.
Until more studies can be performed I think that each case
must be considered individually. Each child is an individual and for some retention
may be the best solution and for another it may not be the best answer.
Rebekah Schofield
Issue #9
Does reinforcement facilitate learning? Yes, I believe it can. First you
should look to see what the real cause of the problem is, what the child needs to learn, and then depending on what your find,
you may need to use reinforcers. Both articles I read, Reinforcement in Developmentally
Appropriate Early childhood Classrooms by Tashawna K.Duncan, Kristen M. Kemple, and Tina M. Smith, and Another View on “Reinforcement in Developmentally Appropriate Early Childhood Classrooms” by Charles
H. Wolfgang, make excellent points, and after having read them, I conclude that as a teacher I need to pay attention to the
children’s behavior, take into account their developmental needs and then act appropriately, which may include reinforcers.
I agree with Wolfgang that when there is unacceptable behavior present that the teacher should step back and try “to
understand [the student’s] developmental needs—specifically, what may be causing such behaviors in the first place.”
Many times in raising my children I have taken this approach. When my children
begin to behave differently or in ways that concern me I try to step back and think whether the behavior is just a stage of
life, or if there really is a concern that I need to address. If I recognize
it as a stage of development, I tend to relax and be able to help them pass through it, learning what they need to learn. If however, it is not a stage of development then I have to look for natural or logical
consequences to help the child change their behavior.
Duncan et al., presents three types of reinforcers,
social reinforcers, activity reinforcers and tangible reinforcers. Of the three,
social reinforcers “are the least intrusive in that they mimic the natural consequences of positive, prosocial behavior.” In raising my children I have taken this approach and find it to be effective. I believe that when teaching children and in disciplining children that you should
consider natural and logical consequences to actions, this is most likely to instill intrinsic, positiv behavior in children
that will serve them well in adulthood.
As we look at misbehavior we must be cautious that we are not creating the problem. Duncan et al., writes, “in
an effort to keep children ‘on task,’ [the teacher] substitutes a control tactic for a meaningful and engaging
curriculum.” I think that that is perhaps the first place that we should look when presented with inappropriate student
behaviors. We should ask ourselves if the curriculum is interesting and challenging
enough for the students. Are they acting out because they are bored, or is there
something else going on? If the
answer is that they are not interested or being challenged then reinforcers will not be an effective tool over the long term;
it will only solve the problem temporarily, if at all. Children need and want to be fed.
By that I mean that they want to learn and be challenged, and if the teacher is not feeding them they will leave, physically
or mentally. I once heard a talk about “fried froth,” if a teacher is only there to entertain or buy the students good behavior, then you are feeding them fried
froth, which is not nourishing, nor long lasting, and the students will leave or die (metaphorically of course).
After reading these articles I have concluded that it is primarily important to step back, observe and think about
why the child is misbehaving, “are the environment, procedures, rules, and daily activities developmentally appropriate
for this child?” And then if they are, then use first social reinforcers,
or logical and natural consequences to change behavior, and use activity and tangible reinforcers only as a last resort, when
the other methods have failed.
|